[BBLISA] OS libraries vs. pip/gem/cpan/etc.?
John Miller
johnmill at brandeis.edu
Fri Jun 13 11:49:25 EDT 2014
Hi folks,
In the past, I've always defaulted to using whatever programming libraries
that came packaged with my OS -- Debian, Ubuntu, Red Hat, etc. If I
couldn't find something I needed, I grabbed it from my language's
repositories: pip, gem, cpan, etc. This has the advantage of getting
security updates from the OS vendor, as well as getting libraries
guaranteed to work with apache/nginx/etc.
These days, I'm not so sure this is always a great idea: you need external
packages, but run into version incompatibilites with system packages. You
also have to keep track of which packages come from which source. Thus a
second method would be to install as much as possible from pip/cpan/gem/etc.
What are folks' takes on this problem? I'm hearing about the latter method
more and more lately; would like to hear everyone's experiences.
John
--
John Miller
Systems Engineer
Brandeis University
johnmill at brandeis.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.bblisa.org/pipermail/bblisa/attachments/20140613/806dd66d/attachment.html>
More information about the bblisa
mailing list